Powered by i.TV
May 19, 2013

'American Idol' Lowers Age Limit to 15

by Scott Harris, posted Jun 21st 2010 12:00PM
Last year's edition of 'American Idol' was the least watched in years, as lethargic fans complained about what many perceived to be a particularly uninspired group of contestants. Well, don't worry, folks, because the producers at 'American Idol' have come up with the perfect plan to fix the problem: more tweens.

Yes, watch out Justin Bieber and Miley Cyrus, because 'American Idol' is coming for you: According to USA Today, 'American Idol' is lowering the age limit for contestants from 16 to 15, effective immediately.

Considering the widespread feeling that the show has suffered from a lack of talent in recent editions, tweaking the age restrictions in order to open up the field to a broader range of participants isn't a complete surprise. But based on how last season went, it seems that 'American Idol' is increasingly less concerned with the amount of talent but rather with the type of talent, as the show continues to skew younger as it chases the teen and pre-teen demographic.

In some ways, the shift makes sense, as it's been clear from recent results that the teenage voting block powers the competition; recent wins by wholesome, mainstream boys like Lee DeWyze, Kris Allen and David Cook over quirkier -- and arguably more talented -- performers like Adam Lambert and Crystal Bowersox are living proof. And the show has recognized this by bringing teenybopper icons Cyrus and Bieber onto the show last season to cater to this rabid and obviously marketable demographic.

Whether or not the change will have any actual effect on the competition, of course, is another matter, as the youngest participants each year rarely make it through the early rounds, David Archuleta being a rare exception. And the move is not likely to endear 'American Idol' producers to older fans already feeling disenfranchised by a voting system that rewards copious free time, disposable income and obsessive-compulsive behavior.

Those traits, however, are also what turn kids into massive pop superstars. So as long as it brings the ratings and gives the show a chance at staying relevant -- and perhaps even creating a Cyrus or Bieber of their own -- you can be sure that 'American Idol' will continue to change whatever rules necessary to keep that bubblegum flowing.

What do you think of the lower age limit?
It's great, we need more talent.2475 (13.9%)
It's fine, but it won't really change anything.8779 (49.4%)
There's already a show about kids singing. It's called 'Glee.'6535 (36.7%)

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

105 Comments

Filter by:
Ally

For those of you who say the age limit to young, I totally disagree. Young people have the greatest potential, and they have lots of time to work on their voice. And, by the way, NONE of the youngest contestants got cut. That truly shows that "little kids" have AMAZNG talent. Maybe a little more thought should go into your accusations(for those people who says that the age limit should be raised).

March 16 2011 at 9:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Becky

I agree with SGT Marc A Scozzafava There is no reason why they can't up the age limit a little bit. I personally also think that there shouldn't be an age limit you can't determine talent based on age. I tried out for american idol a couple of years ago and they were turning down some really good singers. I could hear this one woman that sounded like aretha franklin from where I was sitting and they didnt even give her a second glance.

October 02 2010 at 2:19 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
msets

I hope the show doesn't become a popularity contest. The show should be based on talent, the vocals, and not how cute a teenager is. We'll c what happens

July 11 2010 at 3:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
kumulus

I disagree with lowering the age to 15. I've even thought 16 was too young. I'm sorry, I just can't usually get into the young kids. They're so green and wet behind the ears. So inexperienced. The recent season often made me feel like I was just watching a high school talent show. Plus they're having to do schoolwork on top of everything else during Idol and the parents have to chaperone them. Lowering the age will not guarantee that the tweens will vote for the youngest contestants, either. I remember when the Beatles first came on the scene. Let's see. I was eleven and they were in their early 20's. I was crazy for them, especially Paul. :) Good times.

June 25 2010 at 5:56 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Suzanne

"recent wins by wholesome, mainstream boys like Lee DeWyze, Kris Allen and David Cook over quirkier -- and arguably more talented -- performers like Adam Lambert and Crystal Bowersox are living proof."

Sorry I do not agree with your little comment here...David Cook is not quirky and is quite a bit more talented than either Adam Lambert or Crystal Bowersox. I love Crystal but we don't need another Janis Joplin. I don't want my music to put me to sleep. Adam is highly overrated particularly by people like you...the proof is in the pudding...David Cook's album went platinum in THREE MONTHS, Adam's either just barely went or is still not there and his album has been out for what 7 or 8 months? Adam will fade in time because he really belongs more on Broadway than recording with a major record label. He is to gimmicky, like Lady Gaga...if they were truly talented they wouldn't need all that other crap to draw an audience.

David can outsing, outperform, and outwrite these two with his hands tied behind his back and his mouth taped shut. He is currently working / recording his next album and I can't wait. I am sure it will be great as I expect nothing less from David considering all of his previous albums.

June 23 2010 at 2:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bri

This is ridiculous. The only thing these kids sing are pop. Most used word- Baby. As we've all seen from Justin Bieber. Now that they lowered the age for American Idol, we'll have all these child singers from Disney come rolling in. It's sickening that these kids parents even let them get into this business, tons of make up, the way they dress, staying up hours into the night to hang with a bunch of adults to talk and sing. Alot of them drop out of school, at least in the movie business they do, not too sure about the music industry. Nobody wants to listen to a kid sing. We want to listen to real people sing good music, who actually have an education and had a life before entering the music industry. Robert P. Cant sing at all, but since he was in Twilight, he was made a singer. Oh God, what should ever happen if we don't make an actor a singer! It's depressing how low our music industry is going.

June 23 2010 at 12:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Lauriellenj

I really don't even care any more. In order for AI to be a mega hit again, it needs a major overhaul.

I'm just grabbing on to every inch of Adam Lambert and going on his wild ride to wherever it goes.

June 22 2010 at 5:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Millie

TPTB need to decide what this show is about. Is it about finding -- as Simon has said repeatedly -- a world-wide star (star being someone who sells cds and tour tickets)?

Is it about casting a reality show for the highest number of viewers who buy their sponsors' products (including texting services from AT&T)?

Or is it about both and how do you find that happy medium?

Or... is it, as some viewers believe, a lucky break for a so-called deserving kid, the underdog who otherwise wouldn't get anywhere? In other words, is the show merely a form of televised charity that allows us to feel good about our philanthropy without spending any money? Is that why the voting numbers do not translate into cd and tour ticket sales (ala Kris Allen)? Is it a junior high popularity contest in which a singer who can't hold a tune for 90 seconds but who seems humble and unassuming gets more votes than a better singer with bad teeth? (And please note I am not a fan of Crystal AT ALL, but at least she could hold a tune for 90 seconds.)

What has a SINGING competition come to, when they invite the likes of Miley Cyrus to be a mentor and award the prize to a singer who cannot hold a tune for 90 seconds? Answer: A joke.

June 22 2010 at 4:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike O

I don't see a problem with the age of the contestants but rather the age of the songs! The judges keep telling the contestants that they are not being current but then look at the pool of songs they have to choose from. Beatles (they were broken up before most of the singers were born) Motown? Frank Sinatra week? Then what about the guest performers during the finale? Alice Cooper, Bee Gee's, Michael McDonald, Hall and Oats, Chicago, Joe Cocker and Janet Jackson, What is current about ANY of those performers? I honestly think that at this point American Idol has officially JUMPED THE SHARK!

June 22 2010 at 2:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Marie

I totally agree with the idea of raising the age limit. I'm sure there are lots of young people who are just over the current age limit or perhaps a few years over who are really talented and just need to be given a chance. I have to admit, some of the songs the youngsters sing today, I have no idea what they are. As for the voting, I think it should be left to the professionals. I know some people get many votes because of their looks and really talented people are voted off because they don't fit some people idea of being "cute".

June 22 2010 at 2:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners