'Doctor Who' - 'Vincent and the Doctor' Recap
(S05E10) Uber-writer Richard Curtis penned tonight's episode. The story is that he's a good friend of 'Doctor Who' executive producer Steven Moffat and produced the 'Doctor Who' spoof 'The Curse of Fatal Death' which Moffat wrote. Curtis' children wanted him involved with the show. If only the end result proved as inspired as 'Four Weddings and a Funeral.' Instead, it could very well be the low point of an otherwise very good season.It wasn't a bad episode, perse. Some of the writing was quite good and Tony Curran was excellent as the impressionist painter Vincent Van Gogh. However, the episode seemed to concentrate more on being a Van Gogh love-fest rather than an episode of 'Doctor Who.'
Being a lover of Van Gogh is not necessarily a bad thing for the show (let's not forget that 'Doctor Who' started as a program to get children interested in science and history), but it's easy to tell that Richard Curtis isn't a fan of the show. How easy? His plot revolved around a monster called a Krafayis that was invisible and of unknown origin. It would have been more self-referential (as 'Doctor Who' writers that are fans tend to do) to have the monster be from the planet Spiridon, which is full of invisible creatures and has a history with the Doctor.
Okay, the appearance of the first and second Doctors on the monitor was self-referential. And perhaps they would have had to pay someone rights to use Spiridon and they opted not to. It still would have been a good reference for the die-hard geeks.
Despite all this, the dialogue was quite good although not up to the standard that Curtis has shown in some of his movies. There were hints of Curtis' comic abilities, but they felt toned down. The cast continues to grow on me with Matt Smith being more of a Doctor that seems to have A.D.D.
The monster itself was pretty bland and almost inconsequential to the story. It felt as if halfway through writing the story, Curtis realized that he needed a monster for the heroes to fight. The episode might actually have been more interesting if the Krafayis was completely eliminated and the entire story was simply historical. It would be a case of the Doctor visiting Van Gogh to cheer Amy up from her "loss" (and don't get me started on Van Gogh "coincidentally" being Amy's favorite artist).
Amy instinctively knows that she lost Rory. This will undoubtedly come into play later on. Is Moffat saying that humans have an instinctual knowledge that goes beyond linear time? Or maybe it's just a plot device.
The uncredited appearance of Bill Nighy was a treat. I remember him best from the Simon Pegg (also a 'Doctor Who' fan) movies 'Shaun of the Dead' and 'Hot Fuzz.'
Overall, the episode was cute but bland, and the theme of the historical artist that has been tormented or stalked by alien monsters has run a bit rampant in the relaunched 'Doctor Who' (Shakespeare, Agatha Christie, Charles Dickens). Next week's episode is written by Gareth Roberts who is a long-time writer of 'Doctor Who' in various media, so it should be a step up.

17 Comments