Sorry, Conan... I'm Sticking With Stewart and Colbert

Let me preface this post by saying that, as most readers of this blog know, I've been an unabashed Conan supporter for years. I went to see him on tour, and was excited as hell to see him come back to TV on TBS. And, I'm pretty much in agreement with my esteemed colleague Mo Ryan: Monday's premiere of 'Conan' was way too conventional, but last night's Hanks-aided episode was a lot better.
But, I've got to be honest: once the newness of Conan being on at 11 wears off, chances are that my show of choice at that time is going to be the same as it has been for at least the last eight years: I'll be watching 'The Daily Show.'
Why? Well, there are a couple of reasons, but the main one can be summed up in one word: relevancy.
One of the things I've gotten used to over my time watching 'TDS' -- and since 2005, it's 11:30 cousin 'The Colbert Report' -- was eagerly anticipating how Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and their writing staffs were going to handle the big event in the news from that day. Did the president give an address? How did the news channels handle a big event? Who said something stupid on a talk show? What did Glenn Beck say today?
Both shows have done such a credible and consistent job squeezing big laughs out of sometimes tough circumstances, I've been so conditioned to expect to hear their take on a big story, that I get bitterly disappointed when they're off when a big story breaks.
As much as I love Conan's wacky sense of humor, and hope he does more pre-taped bits like the one he did last night with TBS's standards and practices guy, he was never great with current-events-related humor, whether it was in his monologue or in a pre-taped bit. That's just not what he's about. So, when I was watching 'Conan' over the last two nights, I could feel a sense of anxiety that I was really missing something great on 'TDS.'
Another reason why 'TDS' and 'Colbert' will likely hold my attention more than 'Conan' will is because both shows emphasize comedy over everything else. Unless Jon Stewart is interviewing a bigwig or a someone who is bound to spark debate, like Texas governor Rick Perry, the first two acts of the show are all comedy. And even the interviews tend to go in weird directions, especially when Jon's talking to a celebrity plugging a movie.
Last night, for instance, Jon and Harrison Ford talked mostly about McRibs and Happy Meals, with Jon admitting that he didn't even see Ford's new movie, 'Morning Glory.' It breathed some life into the curmudgeonly Ford, who's usually such a dead-dull interview that you want to stick a fork in your hand while watching, just to prove you're still awake.
'Colbert,' of course, is all comedy, including the interview segment. Stephen Colbert plays his character all the way through each episode, and seeing the often flustered interview subjects try to roll with the punches as Colbert "nails" them is more entertaining than the questions and answers themselves.
The first two episodes of 'Conan' reinforced what we already knew about him: unless he has people on like Hanks and Jack McBrayer, people he can riff with and who are up for anything, he's about as uncomfortable an interviewer as there is on late-night TV. Why would I want to watch Lea Michele talk about being in a singing contest at 8 when I can see Colbert do fun stuff like this?
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Craziest F#?king Thing I've Ever Heard - Crab Vending Machines | ||||
|
||||
Sure, I could DVR 'TDS' and 'Colbert,' watch them online, or watch them in reruns the following day. I do those things when I miss the shows for one reason or another (ok, when I fall asleep before 11... I'm an old fart). But I can do the same thing with 'Conan.' And I'm pretty sure I won't feel I'm missing out on anything if I watch 'Conan' the next morning. Just a hunch.
Which show are you going to watch at 11? Or do you not watch these shows on that old-fashioned thing called a TV?
(Follow @joelkeller on Twitter.)

11 Comments