Pay em off in all that internet money and be done with it. which if i recall was the basis for the show anyways. ok pal?
Future news posting: South Park parodies a thrownout lawsuit which was filed back in November(link) at which time said internet douche tried to sue SP studios for copyright infringement 2.5 years after the fact for a piece of parody.

"We want more money."

I guess the irony of that very episode is escaping these morons. Or maybe it took them 2 years to find a lawyer stupid enough to sue a parody because of copyright infringement.

Here's a clue: If George Lucas and his teams of lawyers couldn't get a dime for Spaceballs spoofing Star Wars, what are the chances that these geniuses will get anything for a South Park episode specifically about internet videos?

This is really stupid.

"The resulting parody was "willful, intentional, and purposeful, in disregard of and indifferent to the rights of Brownmark," the lawsuit states."

Well... yes. Isn't that the point of parody? Isn't parody protected against infringement due to its very nature of copying a pre-existing concept? Aren't there laws protecting it?