'Thriller' or Chiller? 'Glee' Takes on Michael Jackson Classic in Super Bowl Episode
Maybe it's just me. But I flinched when I read an EW headline, which said that 'Glee' is covering Michael Jackson's 'Thriller' in its much-hyped post-Super Bowl episode. The good news, I guess, is that the Super Bowl episode of 'Glee' won't be a Michael Jackson-themed affair. 'Thriller' will be the only Jackson song that the show will cover, and it will be combined with another pop tune to be named later.
Rumors had circulated at one point that 'Glee' would be doing a tribute to one artist (perhaps Bruce Springsteen) for its Super Bowl episode, but EW reports that the show decided not to go in that direction. That's a relief, given what a mess 'Glee's' Britney Spears episode was (let me be clear, Heather Morris was fab in the Britney outing. Everything else? Not so much. The writing in that episode was about as wobbly and vague as Brit's 2007 VMA Awards appearance). The other artists on tap for the Super Bowl episode include Katy Perry, Lady Antebellum and Black Eyed Peas.
It's good that 'Glee' isn't doing a tribute to, well, anything that week, though I still fear that the episode will be an overwrought mess. The thing is, the bigger 'Glee' goes -- whether it's a big idea or a big musical theme -- the more likely it is to fail in the execution.
'Glee' is a messy show, and it revels in that mess, which on occasion can take the form of charming shagginess. Increasingly often, however, it asks to be congratulated for its sloppiest, laziest tendencies, and that may be the show's most annoying quality.
Was it good that 'Glee' attempted to take on the concept of bullying last week? Sure. But it's more disappointing that the show largely failed in its treatment of the subject, given how important that timely topic is. It felt as though 'Glee' was patting itself on the back for an episode that was almost comically unrealistic and superficial. But we're all supposed to congratulate 'Glee' any time it shows even the slightest shred of ambition, right?
Well, no. It'd be nice if 'Glee' attempted to narrative coherence and consistent characterization more than a couple of times per season. But the more successful the show is, the more it indulges itself. I guess, as far as the show is concerned, we should just shut up, put a lid on any kind of desire for consistency and enjoy the next song. It's not that 'Glee' can't be good -- it can be pretty fun when it features one or two stories that feel somewhat connected to reality and when it focuses human-sized emotions and moments, and it can still pull off fun musical numbers at times. But for the most part, 'Glee' wanders around like a three year old in a department store -- picking up whatever shiny object catches its fancy and smashing whatever it feels like smashing. I used to have a theory that Good 'Glee' and Bad 'Glee' battled for supremacy within the show, but now I'm convinced that the only real goal is to get 'Glee'-related topics to trend on Twitter.
Episodes that air after the Super Bowl are rarely good examples of what that particular show does consistently well, so I'm especially worried about 'Glee' airing in that high-profile spot. The show is going to go big -- very big. And the bigger it gets, the harder 'Glee' falls.
Follow @MoRyan on Twitter.

9 Comments