Powered by i.TV
May 27, 2012

Five Reasons to Check Out the 'Camelot' Sneak Peek

by Maureen Ryan, posted Feb 25th 2011 10:45AM
If you're interested in all things Arthurian, the new Starz drama 'Camelot' will get a one-hour sneak preview after the season finale of 'Spartacus: Gods of the Arena' Friday night.

But you'll have to be patient if you like the first installment of the sword-and-sworcery epic: 'Camelot's' real premiere, which will be two hours long, arrives April 1.

No doubt you want to know whether 'Camelot' is worth checking out, either tonight or in a few weeks. I wish I could help you, but I haven't seen this latest iteration of King Arthur's tale (critics won't receive advance DVDs until next week). Still, there's good reason to be intrigued by this new version of the saga of Merlin, Morgan and Arthur. There are five good reasons, in fact:

1. Chris Chibnall is 'Camelot's' head writer and executive producer. Chibnall has a very solid track record in UK television; his resume includes stints writing for the original 'Life on Mars,' as well as for 'Torchwood' and 'Doctor Who.' And when Dick Wolf went across the pond to create 'Law and Order: UK,' he chose Chibnall to lead that commercial and critically successful venture. Ideally, the Arthurian legends should have both human scale and dramatic scope, and on paper Chibnall seems like the guy who could make that happen.

2. The cast looks excellent. Joseph Fiennes, Jamie Campbell Bower, Eva Green, James Purefoy play the key roles of Merlin, Arthur, Morgan and King Lot; again, on paper, that's an impressive crew (so 'FlashForward' wasn't his finest hour, but never mind -- Fiennes generally does fine when someone puts him in tights). Of course, great casts are often squandered in silly projects (I still flinch every time I think of the way the great Ian McShane was stranded in Starz's wretched 'Pillars of the Earth'), but 'Camelot' is starting out strong in the cast department.

3. It's 'Camelot' for grownups. From the few clips I've seen, it doesn't look as though 'Camelot' will be quite as sex-drenched as Starz's 'Spartacus' (and I'm not hating on 'Spartacus,' my affection for that show is well documented). Still, this 'Camelot is not necessarily a squeaky-clean romp that would be appropriate for ABC Family. As Chibnall told the media last month at the Television Critics Association winter press tour, "We've approached it as a drama for adults about characters with complex, conflicting desires. There is some sex in there. There is some violence in there. ...It's a show for adults.... It's not really a family show. There are other versions of the myth that have been told in family shows really brilliantly, but we're more in the 'Rome' mold or the 'Spartacus' mold."

4. 'Camelot's' approach to magic does not consist of the tried and true "wizards and witches to the rescue" formula. Some of my favorite books, TV shows and movies feature magicians and witches, but used the wrong way, magical powers can drain a story of suspense. The thing is, if special powers can always rescue the characters from danger and move the story along, they can start to seem a lot less special. But 'Camelot' does not appear to be going that route. At the same press event, Eva Green noted, "You see people changing shapes, but it's mainly ancient magic, pagan magic, magic using nature and the forces of nature: air, water, Earth, fire. So it's not 'Harry Potter' or Walt Disney. You don't wave a wand." And Fiennes noted that magic actually presents a danger to those who use it. "We're ...slightly introducing this idea that there is an immense cost; that if you dabble in this, that you will be physically, mentally, and spiritually drained," Fiennes said. "And it's really not for the faint-hearted."

5. If nothing else, this Ye Olde Knights-and-Kings Adventure Saga may give us something to watch until the fantasy epic 'Game of Thrones' premieres on HBO on April 17. Less than two months to go in our seemingly endless wait for 'GoT'! And we've got Merlin and Arthur to keep us company until then, and possibly beyond.





Follow @MoRyan on Twitter.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

17 Comments

Filter by:
johanstielf

Being someone with more admiration for "Excalibur" than for any other movie in its genre, I am ridiculously thrilled about this series. Giddy like a kid in a comic store is how you might describe me. Why? For starters, Eva Green is in it - my favorite actress in the world . But not only is the cast just as good as the crew selected for "Rome." The writer will surely give a juicy, maddening mystery twist to the storytelling, seeing as it is the same creative mind that gave us "Life on Mars." And I felt the well received final episodes of "Lost" were built more on universal symbolic myths than sci-fi, so I think the world might be ready for a new and fresh take on a timeless mythology. Oh, and I love your lovely sense of humor, Mo. You rock my fantasy realm!

March 28 2011 at 3:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
johanstielf

Being someone who has always had more admiration for "Excalibur" than for any other movie in its genre, I am ridiculously thrilled about this series. What's more, Eva Green is my favorite actress in the world . Not only is the cast just as good as the crew selected for "Rome." The writer will surely give a mystery bend to the storytelling, seeing as it is the same creative mind that gave us "Life on Mars." And I felt the well received final episodes of "Lost" were built more on universal symbolic myths than sci-fi, so I think the world might be ready for a new and fresh take on a timeless mythology.

March 28 2011 at 3:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SAM

Piece of ****

March 04 2011 at 12:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SAM

Wont watch it.

March 03 2011 at 12:09 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Sareeta

The first episode was really good. I have to admit I know very little about the legend of Camelot/King Arthur, so I don't know where they're going with the story or how it compares to other adaptations, but I love the fantasy genre, especially magic, swords, horses, & costumes. Thankfully all of these are present without coming off as cheesy.

If I have one complaint it's that some of the characters don't look like they are in a medieval fantasy. For example, Arthur himself and the two blonde women he's -with-have modern hairstyles. Other than that, the acting is good, the sets are gorgeous, and the first episode left me wanting more. Also this is the first time I've come away from a pilot loving the "villains." I really like Morgan and James Purefoy's character.

February 26 2011 at 10:10 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Tara

@ Ed

Shakespeare's prose was considered as "anachronistic" in his own day as "Spartacus" dialogue may seem to us. In creating high-speaking, low-born characters he was breaking every rule of drama that had existed since Aristotle. Some of its a little silly, I'll admit (especially continual references to male anatomy), but personally I prefer it to when writers put wildly modern dialogue into the mouths of ancient characters (I'm looking at you Ken Follett). At least they're trying to make it sound somewhat archaic. Besides, read actual Latin -- it's sentence structure is very convoluted, and if you literally transliterated it, you'll come up with sentences rather similar in structure and word order to what is spoken by the "Spartacus" characters.

February 25 2011 at 7:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Ed

If it's as bad as Spartacus was why would anybody bother watching it? Comic book writers should stick to writing comic books instead of trying to stuff their version of Shakespearean prose into the mouths of absolutely uneducated slaves. Elizabethan English had it's place in an Elizabethan play about ancient Rome, but it's wildly anachronistic in modern works based in that period.

February 25 2011 at 7:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
TAUSIF

@darkstar I am not against an adult treatment I just don't like that Merlin is a good show but doesn't get any press coverage.

February 25 2011 at 6:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tara

@dancingqueenre

Considering the shows are being marketed to two completely different audiences (i.e. mostly young adutls vs. mostly adults) I think the show will do just fine. Honestly I can't get into Merlin. Too much of the usual cliche high fantasy claptrap that you can find in any number of other sources. I completely agree with the author's #4 comment. Some of my favorite books, movies, shows etc. are stereotypical high fantay. But I want/need something different and this looks like it'll deliver. I'm actually really eager for someone to put the legends back in their original context, and I'm REALLY looking forward to seeing a darker Merlin.

February 25 2011 at 6:19 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
dancingqueenre

I am too huge a Merlin fan to watch this especially since it is on a premium channel!! Sorry but Bradley James and Collin Morgan rock way more than Jospeh Fiennes. Don't get me wrong. I loved Shakesphere in Love. But I have been watching Merlin since it began and just don't think another version of this legend will survive long on tv. Especially since Merlin is doing so well.

February 25 2011 at 6:06 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners