Powered by i.TV
May 27, 2012

'White Collar' Season 2 Finale Recap

by Bob Sassone, posted Mar 9th 2011 1:45PM
White CollarFor some reason it seems like this is the third season finale of 'White Collar,' doesn't it? The way that the seasons are split up on cable -- and those half-seasons usually see a cliffhanger in each -- it seemed like this was actually the finale for the third season, not the second. I had to double check to make sure I wasn't crazy (note: I wasn't crazy).

And like another finale, this one ended with a bomb going off. But it wasn't the only explosive thing to happen ...

Who would have thought show would turn into 'Raiders of the Lost Ark?' What was once a show about a con man getting out of jail so he could help the FBI with white collar crimes while also looking for his long-lost love has turned into a show where master villains are looking for a sunken Nazi submarine filled with priceless art and other treasures. This show became "bigger" in the second season, and that's both a good and bad thing.

The whole Adler/Nazi plot certainly takes the show in new directions, but let's not hope that it suddenly becomes outlandish. When Neal and Peter opened the hatch (yes, the hatch) of the sub, the camera angle was the same exact one that 'Lost' used when Jack and Locke opened up their hatch. That was either a subtle nod to that show, or maybe there are only so many cool camera angles to choose from when it comes to hatch-opening scenes.

So this season finale ended with three different things happening that I didn't expect. First we had the death of Adler, killed by Peter after Adler was going to shoot Neal. I actually thought that Adler was going to be the villain that taunted Peter throughout the entire run of the series, but he was killed off pretty quickly, a surprise considering he was the "big bad" behind the whole Kate plot (oh, I hope there isn't yet another, bigger bad waiting in the wings). Or maybe Keller can be the bad guy Neal and Peter chase forever.

The second surprise was the explosion in the warehouse. At first everyone thought it was the unstable, WWII dynamite, but someone did it on purpose to cover up the fact that they actually took the treasures out. Peter thinks it was Neal, which irritates the hell out of me. After all these episodes, do they STILL have to trot out the old "Neal, can I really trust you" angle? I really thought we were over that.

And so we come to the third surprise. All of the treasures in the warehouse. Now, this was a surprise to Neal. He went home and found a card -- typed, of course, so we can't figure out whose handwriting it was -- with an address on it. When he went to the address it was yet another warehouse with all the treasures from the sub (and more, it seemed). But this was rather confusing. The narrator hinted that Neal might be behind the con, but that's impossible, because Neal was just as surprised by all of the loot in the warehouse. So he can't be the person behind it.

So who was it? Alex? Mozzie? Sara? Keller? Is Kate still alive? Or how about June? Let's throw her into the mix too. That would be a funny twist.

TV Guide has news on the next season (which premieres this summer) including an interview with creator Jeff Eastin.

More thoughts:

• The gang was right, Adler did take the arch villain thing seriously." Killing them by flooding water into a dry dock while they were all tied up was very 'Batman'-esque. Real crooks would have just shot them and left them on the sub.

Follow Bob on Twitter.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

8 Comments

Filter by:
Diana De León

it's a great mystery for next season. I can't wait.

May 15 2011 at 7:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Diana De León

A great mystery for next season. I can't wait.

May 15 2011 at 7:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ford65s

My guess is FBI Agent Fowler. This is a way of Fowler trying to apologize to Neal for all the damage that he has caused Neal and his friends. As Fowler sees it, Neil can take it and live happy every after, or Neal can take it and turn it in.

March 10 2011 at 4:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
judodog

This show is an enigma (meta intended) Good actors, (in love with Alex) great chemistry, fun, interesting characters (leads as well as supporting), but even accepting the light fare and plot holes inherent in the genre , it still makes no sense,
Badly in need of some tweaking.

March 09 2011 at 5:35 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Spooky

Please let it be June! That would be an awesome twist.

March 09 2011 at 4:51 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
BC

Gosh, if only Peter weren't an FBI agent and Neal weren't a convicted criminal with his own agenda who persists in keeping secrets and doing suspicious things. Peter may be misinterpreting events, but that doesn't mean his concerns are groundless. Because Neal is charming and his crimes are seen as "victimless", or his victims as deserving, we are supposed to see him as a hero, but that doesn't make him one, especially to a man with strong moral convictions.

March 09 2011 at 4:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brett Alan

Not a bad episode, but too over the top for me; I liked last week's much better. The whole dry dock killing was ridiculous, and it wasn't the only thing that really strained credulity.

I suppose the did-Neal-do-it thing mirrors the earlier does-Peter-have-Kate cliffhanger they did earlier, but in both cases it would have been ridiculous to have the person actually be guilty. Alex would make the most sense. Having June be responsible is an interesting idea, but I'd hate to see Diahann Carroll written out. I expect that when the show returns, Peter will learn that Neal is innocent within ten minutes.

March 09 2011 at 4:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
osumarko

Speaking of your Raiders of the Lost Ark comparison, if you look in the background during the final scene with all the treasure, you'll see the Ark of the Covenant.

March 09 2011 at 2:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners