I am seldom impressed by much of anything. But what Maher is doing, and I think he isn't even aware of it, is that his opinions are much more rooted in the pursuit of truth than most others everyone else. This is especially true in politics where TRUTH is not even a part of the debate. What does that say about our society? Everything. What can we expect to transpire? Nothing good. Nothing good, because THE TRUTH is GOOD. THE TRUTH is LOVE.

Everything else is NOT GOOD and NOT LOVE. It is only because Maher lives in the world of politics that he cannot fully ascend, or should I say, "transcend" the debate. But if someone could do it, and we desperately need someone to step up to the plate, Maher can. In this context, Obama suffers a similar fate. I'd rather see both of them go down in flames for all the right reasons than be victorious, whatever that even means.

Go ahead. Call me naive for bring matters of truth, good and love into the debate. Sadly, those who see these matters as naive, are truly naive.

Bill Maher is supposed to be a comedian. He should stick to his trade. He knows nothing about politics or the environment. He is also better when he tones down the crude stuff. His ideas about "global warming" are
out of the dark ages. If he feels so strongly about it he should get some experts on his show to clue him in (forget
James Hanson and Gore). What ever happened to "equal time", incidentally?

J. Ryan Neville, Ph.D.