Powered by i.TV
June 18, 2013

'The Killing' Season 1, Episode 7 Recap

by Maureen Ryan, posted May 8th 2011 11:00PM
['The Killing' - 'Vengeance']

'The Killing' has abandoned the central device of most police procedurals -- we know they're not going to nab the bad guy before the end of the hour. But the removal of that requirement has created other demands on the show.

The gimmick of 'The Killing' is that it is going to take an entire season to find the killer of Rosie Larsen. But before it gets to that big reveal, it has to keep viewers' interest with a series of cliffhangers. And strangely enough, the ending of Sunday's episode left me thinking about '24,' a show with a very different tone and pace.

Sarah Linden's personality is radically different from Jack Bauer's, but the two shows have one thing in common -- both '24' and 'The Killing' have to give us "exciting" endings, to make sure we'll keep tuning in. The reveal at the butcher shop felt especially '24'-like, in that it involved FBI agents busting in to a place that had connections to possibly shady character from a mosque. Though it wouldn't have fit the world of 'The Killing' at all, it would have mildly amused my weird sense of humor to see Jack Bauer demanding that Linden to tell him what she knows "now, damn it!"

In all seriousness, the FBI raid at the meat store felt like a bit of a misfire. Of course Linden and Holder will immediate show their badges and once they're revealed to be police officers, they'll be released and allowed to go about their business. It made for a dramatic moment when the agents busted in, but the "drama" of that moment was also a bit silly. This isn't a dangerous situation for the detectives, it's a simple misunderstanding, one that will be quickly cleared up.

In any event, I'm a bit wary of the idea that Rosie's killing might tie into some kind of federal investigation of those associated with the mosque. Putting all other concerns aside, it just feels like we've been down that storytelling road on many other shows, especially '24.' And to introduce some kind of possible terrorism thread at this late stage in the game would just seem odd and incongruous. (Still, if that transpires, in a perfect world, the analysts from 'Rubicon' would swoop in to shuffle papers and come up with the perfect theory of what transpired in Seattle.)

Seriously, let's hope the show doesn't take a hard turn into '24' territory. I'm sure there are many implications and connections when it comes to Rosie's death, but this is a show that is grounded in emotions and relationships. Nothing against 'NCIS,', but this show does not live in procedural-thriller territory, it's more thematically and atmospherically ambitious than that.

Whether it succeeds in its ambitions is still an open question; though this week's hour was more or less acceptable, I still don't think the show has lived up to its early promise. New Yorker critic Nancy Franklin makes some good points in her review; I'm not quite as negative about the show as she is, though I remain disappointed, as she is, that the characters aren't more interesting by this point. If you're going to jettison aspects of the typical procedural to focus on character, you really have to nail that aspect of the story, and so far the show is patchy in that regard.

Speaking of relationships, I love that Holder immediately figured out that something hinky was going on with Stan's employee, Belko. Belko slyly pocketed Bennet Ahmed's phone, he fed a bunch of sketchy information to Stan last week and this week, he also avoided all conversation with Holder, all of which makes Belko seem even more suspicious.

Here's my main question about Belko: Where's he getting his information? Does he really have a buddy at the school? How did he know about "the cage" in the school's basement? He certainly knows more than he should, and I'm wondering how he's finding all those things out. More shall be revealed on this front, no doubt.

I didn't really mind that Stan didn't kill Bennet, mainly because that would be a little too dark and Gothic for the world 'The Killing' has established. And as Stan and his wife discussed, he's no longer the violent man he was in his past. He just didn't have it in him to kill the freaked-out teacher (though Stan undoubtedly enjoyed making Bennet very, very uncomfortable).

Stan isn't the man he used to be, and in general, 'Vengeance' found the rest of the characters trying, if only in rudimentary ways, to move forward with their lives. Mitch couldn't bring herself to sleep with her husband, but she seemed more alive than she did in recent days, and she was alert enough to fend off the pointed barbs of her mother. (Question: Was it ever explained why Mitch's parents weren't at Rosie's funeral? Or were they there and we just didn't see them?)

Even though Mitch and Stan have begun to climb out of the deepest part of the hole they'd been in, Mitch isn't discounting the idea of vengeance, as we saw from her vigil at the Ahmed house. And though he's trying to hang on through the last stage of his campaign, the mayor won't let Darren Richmond move past his ill-timed public embrace of Ahmed.

Apparently Richmond himself is still haunted by what happened to his own wife. Another question: Though we found out how she died (she was hit by a drunk driver), why won't Richmond forgive himself? What does he have to regret?

As critic Alan Sepinwall has said, I wish the show would just give up on the fiance stuff and acknowledge what is clearly true: That Linden won't leave Seattle until the case is wrapped up. There's no need to dwell on phone calls, plane tickets or trips to the airport. However the Linden-Holder stuff was generally good, which isn't surprising, given how good these actors are.

We did find out that Linden almost lost custody of her son, thanks to her workaholic tendencies, and that she shuts down whenever Regi questions her on her obvious ambivalence about leaving Seattle. Like many cops, Linden is willing and able to peer into the darkest corners of others' lives, but she'd prefer if her own heart and soul remain unexamined. Pointed questions are fine, as long as they're directed at other people, not her.

I just can't get enough of Joel Kinnaman's great performance as Holder; he's my favorite part of the show at this stage. He can be tough, as he was in the scene in which Holder reminds Linden that she's supposed to be gone and he's supposed to be leading the investigation. He can be goofy and playful, as when he shouted "Hey baby" to a passing stranger outside the meat store. Holder is just such a real, fully formed character that I'd enjoy more time spent on him. That's been a consistent frustration; the cast is clearly so capable and the actors have such range that the narrowness of the show's focus is sometimes a drawback.

In any event, like Linden, I'm in this until the end. Let's reconvene and do this again next week.

A few random notes:

• Though it didn't bug this week, I still don't need much of the political campaign story line, though it was kind of amusing when the mayor's commercial acted as the ultimate lovemaking buzzkill.

• Boy, it was convenient that a random stranger put a clue in Linden's shoe at the mosque, huh? As I said last week, the show isn't your usual procedural but it's not above giving its detectives extremely convenient clues, the kind that pervade more typical procedurals.

• It was kind of amusing that the final sequence of scenes was set at a butcher shop, with meat hooks hanging everywhere. It's the kind of location where typical TV detectives find grisly human remains. The show likes to use those kinds of misdirects, in which it plays with the expectations that we have been trained to have by other cop shows. But there were no bodies in this butcher's shop -- just a dozen FBI agents. Psych!

• As always, please share your thoughts, theories and suppositions in comments.

'The Killing' airs 10PM ET Sundays on AMC.


Follow @MoRyan on Twitter.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

18 Comments

Filter by:
jtgulls

Jack to Linden, "trust me".

Chloe to Holden, " I just need to reboot the server so I can breach the firewall and upload the files to Jack's phone unless you have a better idea".

May 14 2011 at 1:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
echyone

Of course Rosie wasn't killed at Bennet's house. In the opening scene of the first episode she was running through the woods.

May 10 2011 at 10:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
putermcgee

i kept rewinding to different parts of the episode, wondering where linden got that address from when she was in the mosque. finally, i searched the internet and ended up here...thanks for mentioning it. i still think the show is pretty good, but i'm disappointed in this little, random hint. also, as some other comments noted, the finance story needs to be dropped unless he's in on the kill in some way.

May 09 2011 at 9:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Connie

Maureen, I'm glad I had the DVR running during this week's episode. My thought, "What butcher shop?" makes me think I nodded off a bit and need to rewatch the episode. :) Also, though I know you are WAY too young to remember, I'm wondering if you've ever watched reruns of "Dobie Gillis." Your boyfriend, Holder, is the closest thing I've seen to Maynard G. Krebbs in a long time, and that itself is a good thing!

May 09 2011 at 1:24 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Connie's comment
jtgulls

You rang? Thanks for mentioning one of tv's all time great sidekicks (before he was "little buddy").

May 14 2011 at 1:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jacob

A mixture of comments and analysis...

1. Remember Holder's AA buddy? Think they're ever going to get back to that guy and explore him and if he was the leak behind the mayor finding out about Bennet?

2. As much as I want to think that all the time spent on Belko is because he must be involved, he just comes across as too much of a loser. The way he reacted to Holder's and Mitch's questions just seemed like he was a little wimpy underling of Stan's from the old days rather than a real player in his own right.

3. We're now officially over half way through the season and like others have mentioned, there are all kinds of open plot points that have been seemingly cast aside. The show needs to stop asking questions and start answering them or else it is going to fall into the trap of not being able to answer /anything/ by the end.

4. As far as characters, Holder and Linden are the most interesting. But I do have to take issue with their ability as police detectives. It's time to get them past the constant needling and have them engage in a big person conversation dealing with facts of the case so that they can sift through what they've learned so far. Jasper and Kris, Bennet and his wife, the mosque and the Feds, Rosie herself. Maureen or one of the commentators made the great point last week that we don't know anything about Rosie and we still don't. Linden and Holder need to meet up back at the office and actually talk this out.

May 09 2011 at 11:24 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jacob's comment
Mo Ryan

Agreed on the abandoned clues. What about the damned shoes??

May 09 2011 at 4:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
mjdawg

Analysts from Rubicon never swept in to produce perfect theories. That's a low blow about a show that was better written than the killing and more interesting.

May 09 2011 at 10:23 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to mjdawg's comment
Mo Ryan

I loved Rubicon! And I was complimenting it. They were really smart and could put together information in thought-provoking and intelligent ways. I'm just saying -- the show could only be improved by the kind of writing and storytelling that Rubicon had. That wasn't a dig at all.

May 09 2011 at 4:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Louis Sytsma

This was the first episode that meandered too much and caused my attention to wander. Perhaps, like mine-series of yesteryear, it should have played on consecutive nights. The day by day progression of the storyline over a weekly period is widening the emotional head space gap between the characters and the viewers in a progressive manner.

Have really enjoyed the series up till tonight.

May 09 2011 at 8:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
TAUSIF

I don't care for the racism in this show. I don' understand why Sud found it necessary to bring Islam into the story line. She does not do anything different with the story line and therefore it fits into standard tropes. One of the underlying themes I hear coming out of the radio caller and Mitch's mother comments is "I know I shouldn't be saying this but I am right that I should be suspicious that he is Muslim." I don't like that this adds to his suspicious nature. Being a Muslim should not make his shadier. They should have shown some actual Muslim activity to show that if Bennett Ahmed is shady it is because his own peculiar behavior. The Imam telling Linden and Holder about his own missing girl case is also something I don't like because I feel it implies that being Muslim implies trouble. I am really troubled by this characterization.

However, I must say when the Imam said, "If you want to me Muhammad come at evening prayer time you will meet 40 of them." He is exactly right. It was moment that is true to life. But even with this bit of humour I am worried about the portrayal of Muslims in this series.

Overall I think the writers should play with the toys they have. They did not need to introduce the parents they should have focused on how the Laarsens and Mitch's sister function as a cohesive unit and show how this carries them through this disfunction. I also think they really shouldn't have added the FBI storyline as this type of slow halting story telling benefits from exploring the small and the little. They are missing a great opportunity by expanding the story to include the FBI.

Stan's comment about boys being sweeter than girls felt hollow because it was not specifically tied to Rosie and his boys in anyway. A father who seems so heart broken by Rosie's loss should be able to needle Bennett with a sweet and warm memory specific to his daughter to show who he believes to be the killer what he has taken from his family. That would have made the scene much better. Instead the tension fell flat.

May 09 2011 at 12:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to TAUSIF's comment
TAUSIF

*girls being sweeter than boys

May 09 2011 at 1:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mark

"Being a Muslim should not make his shadier."

It shouldnt... yet just this week a Delta airlines pilot REFUSED to fly his plane until 2 arab men were escorted off the plane that they paid for a ticket for. just because something shouldnt happen, or just because you disagree with something, doesnt mean it doesnt exist or that other people dont feel that way. this is a show with diverse characters and which tries to stay as real as possible, and i think pretending race doesnt play a part in life / TV would be a cop out.

May 09 2011 at 2:16 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Mark's comment
TAUSIF

I am not saying that discussions of race have no place on television nor am I saying that racist people do not exist.

What I am objecting to is that this is supposed to be a rich complex drama. The way the debate is portrayed in this show is slapdash. If they are going to introduce such a controversial plot line then they should delve deeper into the debate and not just make a couple of racists comments and a visit to the outer section of a mosque be the entire introduction to the plot line. I need to know that there is something deeper to this plot line immediately. If this is not the case I feel that is irresponsible on the part of the writers.

I also understand that people make comments like the mother and caller made. I have heard them myself in real life. I need to know that these comments stem from some deeper character motivations and are not just sounding board ideas that are just sent into the ether. These racist comments should be couched in deeper characterization for the mother. Instead we just see that she is just a nag and a racist which does not make her very sympathetic or comprehensible to a person who might be looking for a complex unlikeable character.

I feel that it is one thing for a character to believe and make racist comments. It is quite another for a writer or showrunner to believe them (from what I saw I don't know what the showrunner believes but I am pretty sure she is using the characters to make the point that some people will say some ridiculous things). I think it is important for the showrunner to make it explicit that they are trying to present a complex story line with diverse characters and that these characters are more than sketches (the main players include Bennett Ahmed) and I do not agree with viewers like the mother or the caller. Part of making the Islamic background more complex undoes the racism of the other characters on screen to show that those people are being unfairly biased. To do otherwise for me in this situation is not only bad television writing but also socially irresponsible.

May 09 2011 at 2:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
stlcardina

This show has now graduated to 'So bad it's good' territory. The only way it will be salvaged if the ending is some out-of-left-field corker, like if the whole town was in on it, "Lottery" style; if it was in actuality a very horrible, very complicated suicide; or if it involved time travel. Or all three.

The politician storyline features some of the most cliched plots and (especially) soul-crushing dialogue I've ever seen. I never thought I'd type these words, but Michael Bay is much more subtle. I half-expect Richmond to strip to his underwear and render himself to the Romans. Actually, a Pilate character would be interesting, since on the politico side, there's not a single person with ambiguity. I thought Richmond had this, but they've run the other direction since the pilot, which makes sense if he's the Big Bad, but then that's predictable. The only saving grace is his scheming advisers aren't making non-stop references to their BlackBerries. But otherwise, this is 'show, don't tell' 101.

On the 'Parent' story, the brusque mother-in-law feels way out of place with the constant weeping and emptiness of the the Larsen couple. It's not that either is not possible, but the contrast is jarring. The problem with attempting a pseudo-real time effect (I know it's per-day, not per-minute) is that you can't move on from certain repetitive stories when the narrative would otherwise demand. Does it make sense the Larsens would act the way they do? Absolutely; it's been seven days since their daughter was savagely murdered. But in the same way it felt ludicrous an a-bomb could go off in "24" and four hours later no one would be talking about it, it's dragging this series down to waste a third of each episode on grief porn. It would work a lot better if the plot took place a few months after the murder.

And the police storyline... The commanding officer is borderline incompetent and curiously adversarial. Have we established if Linden is even getting paid? Or if she even has any jurisdiction? I wish they'd make the 'will-she-or-won't-she-leave' part funny, if they're going to keep this route. Again, something that probably would happen (although not in this manner) because of the time, but it's another 5 minutes of wasted plot.

Did Linden ask Holder (who is great, btw) got his info on Stan from? Shouldn't she?

Can't she at least get to join in the fun of the politicians and able to shout, "I can't let this girl go because of my HISTORY! I have a HISTORY!"

Wouldn't the fact Rosie was alive in the trunk suggest she wasn't murdered at the teacher's house, and therefore the idea her lifeless body was being carried wasn't legit? And isn't it great how that piece of evidence is rendered illegitimate because the CO says it came from an unreliable person? Hey, why not?

I've lost track at how many people have been dismissed from consideration. 10? My money's still on the aunt. She's always there but contributes nothing to the plot. Yet.

May 09 2011 at 12:51 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to stlcardina's comment
big1nfla

My money's on the fiance. That character actor's too good to take this role unless it's significant to the bigger plot.

May 09 2011 at 2:22 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
BC

I don't think it's "random stranger" at all, it's a member of the congregation who doesn't want to be seen being helpful, given the attitude expressed by the imam; or the person they're looking for laying trap; or, given the ending, an undercover informant.

I don't find Holder that enjoyable; his puckishness is actually annoying as he seemed more interested in needling Linden than backing her up as she walked down a dark alley at night to find someone they have reason to believe to be dangerous. He resents her not going away and leaving him in charge, but he's not doing a very good job of convincing me he deserves to be. And I don't think it's important that they aren't in real danger from the FBI; the key is that it was a surprise from left field which presumably requires an explanation.

I'm glad that this week there wasn't so much whinging about the pacing or wondering why people whose daughter has been dead for six days haven't got on with their lives, already. When you're reading a novel you can keep going to the next chapter to keep finding out what's going on; when you're watching a serial it's not really possible to judge until it's over, and if it's unsatisfying then wait for the box set to be released.

May 09 2011 at 12:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to BC's comment
Jean Peters

As to Holder needling Linden--yes. But two sides--I am a long-time employee frequently put in charge of orienting people new to the office, and have done this for years. What has sturck me about Linden is how much I would hate to be a the new person in the office under her. From the very beginning there has been no friendly word, at all, no explanation of anything. She's gone from being surly to him because she can't leave the job for her wedding to being surly to him because she wants to take the job back. At least with his needling, I feel he's got some fight-back in him. As to the rough edges, some of the best people I've trained have come into the job with rough edges and bad clothes. Some of the worst have been control freaks. I think we are supposed to see two types of failings in people. Holder's are pretty much on the surface, there for eveyone to easily see and quickly be very irritated with. Linden's are underneath, and thus possibly more dangerous, an undercurrent of relentlessness, obsessiveness that doesn't concern itself with whether it hurts coworkers, fiance, child. Having said all that, I'm hoping by the end of the series, they will have figured out their distinct personalities work well together. I like them both, hope neither is the killer.

May 09 2011 at 6:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners