'Sons of Anarchy' Season 4, Episode 2 Recap (VIDEO)
['Sons of Anarchy' -- 'Booster']This episode provides textbook examples of what I think is working -- and wobbling -- this season on 'SOA.'
The long-term tensions, alliances, goals and conflicts that are being set up among various club members are gold, as far as I'm concerned. One thing I especially like about this episode is the variation on a theme we've seen explored in the past -- the idea that when Clay and Jax are allied, they're actually more dangerous to the club than when they're at each others' throats.
That's not to say that the alliance is smooth sailing all the way. Far from it. Jax felt blindsided by the deal that Clay had made with the cartel about transporting coke, and Clay couldn't believe that Jax would really and truly walk away from the club forever. Both men were forced, not willingly, to accept the situation as it is, and given their parallel goals -- to make money before leaving the club's leadership positions -- they had to grudgingly get over whatever problems they might have with each other's actions.
So that's all fine well and good, and I can see lots of potential in those kinds of internal conflicts and alliances. As for the episodic plot of the week, well, that was less enjoyable. I had one minor annoyance and one major one.
The minor annoyance had to do with the Gemma plot and the John Teller letters. I think we need to institute something I'll call the Old Lady Story Alert (OLSA). Last year, Tara was stuck in an abduction story line that never quite came together and which didn't make her seem as intelligent as she normally is. The less said about that whole plot the better, but I think we can all agree that, on a scale of 1-5, that was a 5 on the OLSA scale (with 5 signifying the number of drinks you had to take to make the story line tolerable).This season, we've got Gemma rooting around in drawers and stretching out the whole "Who Killed JT" plot, which already feels a bit long in the tooth. I'm willing to give that thread some slack, given that we're early in the season, but if the JT murder story gets strung out too long, it may well go higher than its current rating of 2 on the OLSA Threat Level Scale. Let's just get this out of the way, in case there's any confusion: I love Gemma. I love the performances Maggie Siff and Katey Sagal give; they're phenomenal actresses. So let's just hope they get some good and meaty story lines this season, and that the John Teller plot doesn't begin to seem like an excuse to give the women something to do.
All right, my major annoyance with the episode boils down to this: If the cartel put the word out that the Sons were not to be messed with, why did the Russians mess with them? I understand that the Russians would be itching to get revenge for their murdered colleagues, but I'm working under the impression that when the cartel says not to do something, you don't do it!
Maybe I've been watching too much 'Breaking Bad,' but it strikes me as not quite credible that the Russians would come after the Sons (indirectly, but not *that* indirectly), given how powerful and deadly the cartels are. You mess with them in any way, you die, even if you mess with their ammo suppliers, you know?
To me, the more logical course of action would be that, after being told to back off, the Russians would lick their wounds, get out of town and go find a new set of customers in a new part of the state or country. So the entire story line didn't make a ton of sense to me, and the whole issue of the 24 guns also seemed a bit confusing. (Were those guns the club took when they were murdering the Russians? I'll be honest, I lost the plot when it came to the two dozen guns and what that was all about. I know people will try to clarify this in the comment area, and thanks in advance for that, but given that the whole story line wasn't really clicking for me, I'm not going to expend a lot of brain power trying to do the math on the disputed weaponry.)
In any event, the point of the episode seemed to be to prove that the cartel has the Sons' back, but even that aspect of things didn't quite work for me. This is information I had early in the episode: As the local representative of the cartel, Romeo Parada (Danny Trejo's character), told the Sons the cartel have the club's back. He certainly seemed like a man of his word, so I didn't see a particular need to have that information reinforced.
My reaction to the Russian plot boiled down to this: I never thought Jax or Opie were really in danger. I knew someone would ride to the rescue just in the nick of time, and the way Parada did so was actually a bit of a letdown. It struck me as a bit of Cartel Ex Machina. So Parada just happened to have a guy on the inside who let him know what was going down? OK then. If what transpired with the Russians on the reservation was partly a setup for what's to come, it just didn't feel particularly necessary.
So, it wasn't my favorite episode, but there were things to like in it. I am a fan of any Jax-Opie interaction, the Clay-Jax stuff was excellent, and the episode did a deft job of showing us the three kinds of old ladies: Some think they need to know everything (Tara), some know the broad outlines and assist with those (Gemma) and some don't want to (or can't) know anything (Lyla). Does any of those strategies put the lives of family members in any less danger? That remains to be seen.Finally, I'm a little torn on the rampage we saw from new sheriff Eli Roosevelt. Not to say that Rockmond Dunbar didn't play the scene convincingly (he did), but part of me wonders if his axe rampage in the club was a bit overdone. Of course, the club brought payback on itself with the murders they dumped in the sheriff's lap, but I wondered if it would have felt a bit more believable had Roosevelt stayed a calm, collected law-enforcement rival and not openly provoked the Sons like that.
Perhaps the idea is that Roosevelt is the more in-your-face opponent and new prosecutor Linc Potter is the more cool, collected one, but what if the club had two cool, collected, intelligent foes? I just wondered whether that might be double the fun.
What did you all think?
Follow @MoRyan on Twitter.

19 Comments