Powered by i.TV
May 27, 2012

'Simpsons' Actors Will Accept Pay Cut to Save Show

by Chris Harnick, posted Oct 7th 2011 5:15PM
The SimpsonsUPDATE: The great 'Simpsons' salary showdown of 2011 is over. The show will be back for two more seasons. Click here for details.

From earlier ...

According to the Hollywood Reporter, the cast has agreed to a pay cut to keep the show going. However, it's not as steep as the 45 percent previously reported, nor does the new deal include back end profits from licensing, syndication and merchandise.

The show's producers have already agreed to budget cuts to keep the show going, but they reportedly have back end profit deals the actors do not.

'Simpsons' voice actor Harry Shearer, the voice of Mr. Burns, Ned Flanders and Principal Skinner among others, released a statement on Fri., Oct. 7 saying he would have taken an even bigger salary cut if Fox agreed to letting the actors in on merchandising profits. Fox did not back down.

"Fox wants to cut our salaries in half because it says it can't afford to continue making the show under what it calls the existing business model," he wrote. "Fox hasn't explained what kind of new business model it has formulated to keep the show on the air, but clearly the less money they have to pay us in salary, the more they're able to afford to continue broadcasting the show. And to this I say, fine -- if pay cuts are what it will take to keep the show on the air, then cut my pay. In fact, to make it as easy as possible for Fox to keep new episodes of 'The Simpsons' coming, I'm willing to let them cut my salary not just 45 percent but more than 70 percent -- down to half of what they said they would be willing to pay us. All I would ask in return is that I be allowed a small share of the eventual profits."

The salary stalemate began on Mon., Oct. 3. Fox released a statement on Tues., Oct. 4 claiming the show could not go on in its current production model.

"23 seasons in, 'The Simpsons' is as creatively vibrant as ever and beloved by millions around the world. We believe this brilliant series can and should continue, but we cannot produce future seasons under its current financial model," the studio said. "We are hopeful that we can reach an agreement with the voice cast that allows 'The Simpsons' to go on entertaining audiences with original episodes for many years to come."

There has been no official confirmation from the actors or the studio.

Tell us: Should the actors accept a pay cut to keep the show going?



Below, check out a playlist of 'Simpsons' clips:


Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

22 Comments

Filter by:
DrProcto

I read somewhere that some were making as much as 450K per episode, well over a million a year. Even with a 45% cut, they'll still be grossing over a mil. And Obama said, these are the people we should be going after, the millionaires who are not paying their fair share. This pay cut might actually be a blessing since it will lower their tax bite.

October 07 2011 at 8:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to DrProcto's comment
CyberOpticDragon

I think we should be going after the producers who are getting a share of the billions, and CEO heads, people who have multimillion dollar homes, summer houses, ridiculous luxeries.

November 01 2011 at 7:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
higgdj7

Imagine those working actors willing to take big salary cuts to share on the profits later down the road. Those ever caring, never sharing elitist Faux people at Fox said NO! Wake up people! Working people are tools, nothing more nothing less. They have the money to buy the people that make the rules/laws. Wanna know why the "MOB" is occupying Wall St.???Don't ask Faux Knews, cause they ain't fair and balanced on this.

October 07 2011 at 8:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
dentistguy

The actors can and should do what they want, it's nobody else's business.

October 07 2011 at 8:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Tom

Eat my shorts. The show shall go on even with this f-ed up countries new beliefs. AMEN!!!

October 07 2011 at 8:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
fire4adrymouth

FOX is a greedy pig! Karmas a bitch though

October 07 2011 at 8:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
escrooge00

Why should they take a pay cut to put more money in Rupert Murdochs pocket or any of the other greedy executives at Fox? If I was a cast member I would try to drain every drop from the billionaire Murdoch and triple digit millionaire executives.

October 07 2011 at 7:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
monaco53

Anyone who thinks that show would have lasted 23 years if they did not luck out with the incredible talent they have is crazy. Those actors were part of Tracy Ullman's show and Fox should be honored they stayed with the program. Where is Matt Groenig in these discussions? Fox is trying to pull the plug and put the blame on the cast. This has to be one of the biggest television/marketing franchises of all time. And Newscorp can't find a few percentage points to throw the stars from all the back end millions they've been reaping all these years. This is another pathetic example of corporate greed, and it's The Simpsons for goodness sake! Is nothing sacred anymore.

October 07 2011 at 7:13 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
sidewinder2180

Fox= greed!!!!!

October 07 2011 at 7:10 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Hi! Dude!

Fox is a corporate thug.
Actors deserve a percentage.

October 07 2011 at 7:10 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
rrbadluck

I'm glad that the gang will be on our t.v. screen's for a while longer, but I think it's time C.E.O.'s and other corporate type's take the pay cut's and get down sized!!!

October 07 2011 at 6:40 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Us

From Our Partners