EDITION: U.S.
in defense of
In Defense Of: Craig Kilborn
by Bob Sassone, posted Jul 1st 2010 2:00PM
It's too early to tell if Craig Kilborn's new daily show, 'The Kilborn File,' will be a success or not. Right now, three episodes in, the ratings aren't good, but the quality isn't bad. While it is certainly experiencing some new show pains -- glitches, segments that just don't work, so-so guests -- it has a lot of potential to be as good as Kilborn's "Late, Late Show' was before the other Craig took over.Some of you reading the words "to be as good as Kilborn's 'Late, Late Show' are probably scratching your heads because you thought that show was terrible. Simply put, if you don't like Kilborn, you won't like 'The Kilborn File.'
In Defense of 'FlashForward': Why You Should Give The Show Another Shot
by Gabrielle Dunn, posted Mar 18th 2010 4:00PM
I am a 'Lost'-ie who loves 'FlashForward' -- and I do not apologize.Yes, I know ABC insists on pushing 'FlashForward' as a sorry replacement for its biggest hit, 'Lost,' which ends in May after six amazing seasons. Yes, I know it's got a gimmicky sci-fi premise (the whole world blacks out for 2 minutes and 17 seconds and everyone sees six months into the future). Yes, I know it's been months since the show's last episode aired. And yes, I am apparently the only person looking forward (ha!) to its return this week.
'FlashForward,' based on novels by Robert J. Sawyer, debuted strong to 12.47 million viewers last September (compared to the 'Lost' season 6 premiere's 12.1 million). But in the following weeks, the new drama's viewership dropped off. On the eve of its second wind, I'd like to ask you -- fellow 'Lost'-ies and non-fans alike -- to give 'FlashForward' another chance.
In Defense Of: Maria Bamford
by Adam Finley, posted Feb 9th 2006 6:07PM
There's a tendency in our culture, and it's certainly prevalent in the
blogosphere, to snark at anything that doesn't immediately turn us on. I'm guilty of this myself, but I cut myself some
slack because I'm writing about the entertainment industry, which is, to me anyway, of little consequence within the
Grand Scheme.In Defense Of: Deal or No Deal
by Joel Keller, posted Dec 21st 2005 11:22PM
A couple of days ago, my fellow game show fan Bob gave a big thumbs down to Deal or No Deal,
the new game show on NBC. He thought the premise, where a contestant goes through torturous rounds of elimination
to determine if the briefcase he picked has a ton of money in it, got too tedious after 20 minutes or so. He also
thought the "banker", who calls in between each rounf to offer to buy the case off the contestant for mostly
increasing amounts of money, was a goofy device.Well, I didn't get a chance to watch the show until tonight, and I've got to say, I liked it. In this episode a woman managed to get the bank offer up to $201,000 before taking the deal, which turned out to be the right decision. Same with the second contestant, who, even though many of the big money cases were eliminated early, got the bank offer up to $99,000 before leaving his 50-50 shot behind (again, he made a good deal).
TV Squad Hot Topics
Most Popular Articles
From Our Partners
- TV ratings: 'Grimm' and 'Shark Tank' rise, CBS stays on top Friday
- John Goodman, Roseanne Barr reunite in NBC pilot 'Downwardly Mobile'
- 'The Vampire Diaries' recap: In which Elena is starting to get on our nerves
- 'Fringe': 'Lost's Henry Ian Cusick cast
- 'Bones' will (finally!) return to FOX on April 5
- More From Zap2it
- James Wolk Enters Political Fray, Joins USA Network's D.C.-Based Drama Series
- Ratings: Shark Tank Makes a Splash, Fringe Matches Low, Supernatural Dips and Grimm Gains
- Shameless' Justin Chatwin Previews Steve's Quest to Win Back Fiona and His 'Sticky' Mess
- Pilot Scoop: Michael B. Jordan Reunites with Friday Night Lights Boss on NBC's County
- Pilot Scoop: Shonda Rhimes' Gilded Lilys Period Drama for ABC Casts Blythe Danner, Others
- More From TVLine
